Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
null (Ed.)Abstract A unique feature of small mountainous rivers is that discharge can be elevated by an order of magnitude during a large rain event. The impact of time-varying discharge on freshwater transport pathways and alongshore propagation rates in the coastal ocean is not well understood. A suite of simulations in an idealized coastal ocean domain using the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) with varying steady background discharge conditions (25–100 m 3 s −1 ), pulse amplitude (200–800 m 3 s −1 ), pulse duration (1–6 days), and steady downwelling-favorable winds (0–4 m s −1 ) are compared to investigate the downstream freshwater transport along the coast (in the direction of Kelvin wave propagation) following a discharge pulse from the river. The nose of the pulse propagates rapidly alongshore at 0.04–0.32 m s −1 (faster propagation corresponds with larger pulse volume and faster winds) transporting 13%–66% of the discharge. The remainder of the discharge volume initially accumulates in the bulge near the river mouth, with lower retention for longer pulse duration and stronger winds. Following the pulse, the bulge eddy disconnects from the river mouth and is advected downstream at 0–0.1 m s −1 , equal to the depth-averaged wind-driven ambient water velocity. As it transits alongshore, it sheds freshwater volume farther downstream and the alongshore freshwater transport stays elevated between the nose and the transient bulge eddy. The evolution of freshwater transport at a plume cross section can be described by the background discharge, the passage of the pulse nose, and a slow exponential return to background conditions.more » « less
-
Abstract The ocean is home to many different submesoscale phenomena, including internal waves, fronts, and gravity currents. Each of these processes entail complex nonlinear dynamics, even in isolation. Here we present shipboard, moored, and remote observations of a submesoscale gravity current front created by a shoaling internal tidal bore in the coastal ocean. The internal bore is observed to flatten as it shoals, leaving behind a gravity current front that propagates significantly slower than the bore. We posit that the generation and separation of the front from the bore is related to particular stratification ahead of the bore, which allows the bore to reach the maximum possible internal wave speed. After the front is calved from the bore, it is observed to propagate as a gravity current for ≈4 hours, with associated elevated turbulent dissipation rates. A strong cross-shore gradient of along-shore velocity creates enhanced vertical vorticity (Rossby number ≈ 40) that remains locked with the front. Lateral shear instabilities develop along the front and may hasten its demise.more » « less
-
Abstract After a relaxation of the regional southward, upwelling‐favorable winds along the central California coast, warm water from the Santa Barbara Channel propagates northward as a buoyant plume. As the plume transits up the coast, it causes abrupt temperature changes and modifies shelf stratification. We use temperature and velocity data from 35 moorings north of Pt. Arguello to track the evolution of a buoyant plume after a wind relaxation event in October 2017. The moorings were deployed September–October 2017 and span a ∼30 km stretch of coastline, including nine cross‐shelf transects that range from 17 to 100 m water depth. The high spatial resolution of the data set enables us to track the spatiotemporal evolution of the plume, including across‐front temperature difference, cross‐shore structure, and propagation velocity. We observe an alongshore current velocity signal that takes ∼10 hr to propagate ∼25 km alongshore (∼0.7 m/s) and a temperature signal that takes ∼34 hr to propagate the same distance (∼0.2 m/s). The plume cools as it transits northward, leading to a decrease in the cross‐front temperature difference and the reduced gravity (g’). The plume’s propagation velocity is nonuniform in space and time, with accelerations and decelerations unexplained by the alongshore reduction ing’or advection by tidal currents. As the plume reaches the northernmost part of the mooring array, its temperature variability is obscured by internal waves, a prominent feature in the region. We focus on one relaxation event but observe five other similar events over the 2 months record.more » « less
-
Abstract This study examines the utility of Eady-type theories as applied to understanding baroclinic instability in coastal flows where depth variations and bottom drag are important. The focus is on the effects of nongeostrophy, boundary dissipation, and bottom slope. The approach compares theoretically derived instability properties against numerical model calculations, for experiments designed to isolate the individual effects and justified to have Eady-like basic states. For the nongeostrophic effect, the theory of Stone (1966) is shown to give reasonable predictions for the most unstable growth rate and wavelength. It is also shown that the growing instability in a fully nonlinear model can be interpreted as boundary-trapped Rossby wave interactions—that is, wave phase locking and westward phase tilt allow waves to be mutually amplified. The analyses demonstrate that both the boundary dissipative and bottom slope effects can be represented by vertical velocities at the lower boundary of the unstable interior, via inducing Ekman pumping and slope-parallel flow, respectively, as proposed by the theories of Williams and Robinson (1974; referred to as the Eady–Ekman problem) and Blumsack and Gierasch (1972). The vertical velocities, characterized by a friction parameter and a slope ratio, modify the bottom wave and thus the scale selection. However, the theories have inherent quantitative limitations. Eady–Ekman neglects boundary layer responses that limit the increase of bottom stress, thereby overestimating the Ekman pumping and growth rate reduction at large drag. Blumsack and Gierasch’s (1972) model ignores slope-induced horizontal shear in the mean flow that tilts the eddies to favor converting energy back to the mean, thus having limited utility over steep slopes.more » « less
An official website of the United States government
